The question as to whether or not it's a wise decision to buy gold has been asked in the mainstream media for quite some time. I say the answer to that question depends on what the central banks are doing since they have a direct effect on what happens to the value of their country's currency.
The central banks are now net buyers of gold and the Bank of Internal Settlements that guides the central banks of the world is considering making gold a Tier 1 core asset that all banks should have as part of their assets instead of gold's current Tier 3 status as of this writing. If all the central banks are doing the complete opposite of what the mainstream wall street pundits say by buying gold, who would you believe? The people who actually directly affect the value of their fiat currencies or the guys on wall street who just talk about what they think might happen?
Tuesday, June 5, 2012
Sunday, May 13, 2012
Year of 2012
The mining shares across the board have fallen to ridiculously low levels with some even hitting their 2009 lows. For the physical precious metals, while they are off their peaks they stand well above their 2009 price lows. Is it just me or is there a huge disconnect between the prices of the miners and the price of the ores they mine? My guess is that the miners are very undervalued right now. There may be continued weakness through the summer but ultimately in a few years time, the prices of the miners should rocket upwards.
The news for commodities in general is particularly bearish right now. I just read an article on cnn.com where the author was laughing and mocking all the goldbugs for being wrong which is absolutely ridiculous because the author points to a 17% drop from gold's all time high but ignores the fact that gold rose from $250 an oz and is holding steady at the $1500 an ounce range. What I find consistent among all these people who despise gold is they point out that gold isn't money, that gold doesn't bring in any dividends, etc... but I think what they fail to realize is that when one owns gold you're not getting rich. It's just that the people around you are getting more poor. Rich is when you go to another country that has a much stronger currency than yours and you find that the prices don't really bother you.
Of course, I'd have to agree that all things end in a bubble and that in the end you do want a share in a company that pays dividends as oppose to a chunk of gold which pays nothing. The truth is gold is no more money than copper or salt, but then again neither is fiat currency. Money is whatever the majority of traders will accept as payment. If you can't understand this, then don't buy gold.
The news for commodities in general is particularly bearish right now. I just read an article on cnn.com where the author was laughing and mocking all the goldbugs for being wrong which is absolutely ridiculous because the author points to a 17% drop from gold's all time high but ignores the fact that gold rose from $250 an oz and is holding steady at the $1500 an ounce range. What I find consistent among all these people who despise gold is they point out that gold isn't money, that gold doesn't bring in any dividends, etc... but I think what they fail to realize is that when one owns gold you're not getting rich. It's just that the people around you are getting more poor. Rich is when you go to another country that has a much stronger currency than yours and you find that the prices don't really bother you.
Of course, I'd have to agree that all things end in a bubble and that in the end you do want a share in a company that pays dividends as oppose to a chunk of gold which pays nothing. The truth is gold is no more money than copper or salt, but then again neither is fiat currency. Money is whatever the majority of traders will accept as payment. If you can't understand this, then don't buy gold.
Monday, April 16, 2012
2012: The Year of Massive Price Increase in Metals
I've been following multiple investment newsletters and blogs from people who all have very different ideas as to why the prices of precious metals and other commodities are the way they are. Some think there is a big conspiracy out there of big banks pushing down prices, others think that it's just a part of a much larger centuries old global economic cycle, and others just follow their own technical chart analysis. Usually, these people tend to conflict as to what is going to happen next until recently.
All of them say that this year 2012 is going to be a spectacular year in terms of price movement of metals and commodities to the upside. Could it be? The last time I saw this agreement across the board was back in 2010 mid year when Andrew Maguire first broke the news about the CFTC meeting affirming that bullion banks were ridiculously over leveraged.
Without listening to anyone else, my guess would also be yes simply because the Fed stated that in 2014 they will let the interest rates rise and the massive rounds of money printing. I think a lot of people are going to be hesitant about what those 2014 interest rates will bring and this will cause a dramatic shift in prices everywhere. Whether prices go up or down, I don't think the impact will be light. One thing for sure is I expect a wild ride for the next few years! If interest rates do rocket to 20% like they did in the 1980s, then bonds are going to start looking mighty attractive even if the threat of hyperinflation becomes more real.
Another interesting thought that occurred to me recently is how the idea of the world returning to a gold standard seems less and less probable. Some people argue that there simply isn't enough gold out there for gold to be a global currency which I don't agree with. This argument assumes that literally people are going to need a piece of gold in their hands. A more likely scenario of a world on a gold standard is that currency would be based off of some fraction of gold but to me even though it is technically possible to return to a gold standard, it would not be in China's best interest. The biggest most powerful player in the world won't let anything happen if it's not in their interest. If the rumors are true that China has only a tiny amount of gold compare to its fiat currency holdings then returning to a gold standard would mean disaster for them because Western central banks hold a lot more gold than they do. China would be right back at square one economically.
Instead what China will do and has been doing since 2009 is to continue to push for the reminbi to become a global currency and continue international trades without the dollar as a middle man. From the looks of major trade dealings going on between the Asian countries it looks like that may soon become a reality. This means good bye dollar value!! Forget conspiracy theories about big banks pushing down metal prices, you should diversify away from the dollar anyways because it's no longer going to be the world's reserve currency. This is not something that can be voted on and debated on. If countries don't want to trade in dollars, there's not a thing the US can do about it. The US used to be able to bomb those countries who didn't want to use the dollar but not anymore. The US is broke.
All of them say that this year 2012 is going to be a spectacular year in terms of price movement of metals and commodities to the upside. Could it be? The last time I saw this agreement across the board was back in 2010 mid year when Andrew Maguire first broke the news about the CFTC meeting affirming that bullion banks were ridiculously over leveraged.
Without listening to anyone else, my guess would also be yes simply because the Fed stated that in 2014 they will let the interest rates rise and the massive rounds of money printing. I think a lot of people are going to be hesitant about what those 2014 interest rates will bring and this will cause a dramatic shift in prices everywhere. Whether prices go up or down, I don't think the impact will be light. One thing for sure is I expect a wild ride for the next few years! If interest rates do rocket to 20% like they did in the 1980s, then bonds are going to start looking mighty attractive even if the threat of hyperinflation becomes more real.
Another interesting thought that occurred to me recently is how the idea of the world returning to a gold standard seems less and less probable. Some people argue that there simply isn't enough gold out there for gold to be a global currency which I don't agree with. This argument assumes that literally people are going to need a piece of gold in their hands. A more likely scenario of a world on a gold standard is that currency would be based off of some fraction of gold but to me even though it is technically possible to return to a gold standard, it would not be in China's best interest. The biggest most powerful player in the world won't let anything happen if it's not in their interest. If the rumors are true that China has only a tiny amount of gold compare to its fiat currency holdings then returning to a gold standard would mean disaster for them because Western central banks hold a lot more gold than they do. China would be right back at square one economically.
Instead what China will do and has been doing since 2009 is to continue to push for the reminbi to become a global currency and continue international trades without the dollar as a middle man. From the looks of major trade dealings going on between the Asian countries it looks like that may soon become a reality. This means good bye dollar value!! Forget conspiracy theories about big banks pushing down metal prices, you should diversify away from the dollar anyways because it's no longer going to be the world's reserve currency. This is not something that can be voted on and debated on. If countries don't want to trade in dollars, there's not a thing the US can do about it. The US used to be able to bomb those countries who didn't want to use the dollar but not anymore. The US is broke.
Wednesday, January 11, 2012
NY Times: The True Story of Japan's Economy
I love it when I read articles that state the same things I've been suspecting myself. For a long time, I've been wondering why the US media always talks about Japan's economy in a negative light. Despite all the negative portrayals of Japan's economy, when you set foot in Japan as an American what the media says just doesn't add up to what is actually there right in front of your eyes.
If you compare the average Japanese citizen to the average American citizen, Americans are paupers in more ways than one. The average Japanese has a better lifestyle, luxuries, eats out more, dresses better, has better public services and facilities, more advanced buildings, technologies, etc... Why is this never talked about or considered when discussing how well Japan is doing as a country? I agree with most of what the article posted below says, although I disagree with why the population birth rate is so low.
I think that has to do more with cost and being physically unable to raise a family of more than 2 kids in terms of living space and transportation. I've seen moms ride bikes with their kids to get around. The most you can fit on a bike is two which leaves little room for groceries. Where would you stick the third or fourth kid? On your back? Your head? It may seem silly that I would use a bike as a reason for the low birth rate, but when you look at how majority of the people in Japan get around, very few people have personal cars and even if they do have cars they don't use them as regularly as someone in America. Why? It's cost prohibitive and where would you park the thing even if you could afford it? Few people have houses, much less have a house that can accommodate more than one car. Most families live in flats the size of shoeboxes. Those lucky enough to get a house have to take out multi generational loans which is unheard of in America.
Anyways, enough of this. Here's the article. Enjoy!
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/08/opinion/sunday/the-true-story-of-japans-economic-success.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all
If you compare the average Japanese citizen to the average American citizen, Americans are paupers in more ways than one. The average Japanese has a better lifestyle, luxuries, eats out more, dresses better, has better public services and facilities, more advanced buildings, technologies, etc... Why is this never talked about or considered when discussing how well Japan is doing as a country? I agree with most of what the article posted below says, although I disagree with why the population birth rate is so low.
I think that has to do more with cost and being physically unable to raise a family of more than 2 kids in terms of living space and transportation. I've seen moms ride bikes with their kids to get around. The most you can fit on a bike is two which leaves little room for groceries. Where would you stick the third or fourth kid? On your back? Your head? It may seem silly that I would use a bike as a reason for the low birth rate, but when you look at how majority of the people in Japan get around, very few people have personal cars and even if they do have cars they don't use them as regularly as someone in America. Why? It's cost prohibitive and where would you park the thing even if you could afford it? Few people have houses, much less have a house that can accommodate more than one car. Most families live in flats the size of shoeboxes. Those lucky enough to get a house have to take out multi generational loans which is unheard of in America.
Anyways, enough of this. Here's the article. Enjoy!
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/08/opinion/sunday/the-true-story-of-japans-economic-success.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)